oldearthcartography:

elodieunderglass:

grison-in-space:

out-there-on-the-maroon:

nailsofvecna:

honestmerchantsailor:

vrabia:

vrabia:

ok but like. space shanties. 

there’s a thing that should definitely be a thing in sci-fi.

my brain went straight to the ‘put him in the airlock ‘till he’s sober’ part of ‘what can you do with a drunken spacer’ and i never want to look back from this. 

THIS IS 100% A THING. It’s usually considered a subset of filk, so naturally a lot of prolific filk artists like Leslie Fish have a selection. Sci-fi filk is possibly my favorite genre of music.

Most of these are actually ballads, not true shanties, but still:

The Senate - Space Shanty

Kristoph Klover - Fire in the Sky

Duane Elms - Dawson’s Christian

Catherine Faber - Providence Skies

Julia Ecklar - Ballad of a Spaceman

Leslie Fish & Ann Prather - Hanrahan’s Bar

Julia Ecklar & Ann Prather - Pushin’ the Speed of Light

Leslie Fish - Ship of Stone

Leslie Fish - Guardians

Leslie Fish - Sam Jones

Vic Tyler - Space Hero

Vic Tyler & Duane Elms - Spacer’s Home

You can probably just google “sci-fi filk” and get a zillion more. It’s a surprisingly rich genre for one so unknown to most people.

I don’t normally reblog this kind of post, but this seems so perfect as background music for a dark matter game, I had to share it with you all. SPACE SHANTIES HO!

For those unaware reblogging this post, “What Shall We Do With A Drunk Space Pirate” was the close out song for the Mechanisms concerts. Their entire discography was taking folk songs and making them sci-fi epic concept albums. 

Some of my favorite songs include:

Matty Groves, now with electric violin, about a lute that controls the dead.

Pump Me Boys, now a shanty about keeping the life support systems running on a dying ship.

Gently Johnny, now about sirens in a neo-noir sci-fi city lulling people into complacency.

Rising of the Moon, now about a doomed manager of a space station that descends into chaos and mutiny, left abandoned.

So I’m married to a person who grew up in Canada’s folk scene, and we often talk about folk music as a genre. I was cranky about the way that people tend to slap an “alt-folk” label on folk because they assume true folk is a dead genre, and I got thinking and went: what is a dead genre, anyway?

T chirped “sea shanties!” and then added “not that you can’t compose a new one, but it’s not in conversation with other songs that are being published at the same time, it’s only in conversation with other songs that have been written long before.” It’s important to know, in this conversation, that Tay grew up around Stan Rogers’ family and therefore knows damn well that you can write a song in the modern era that everyone assumes is a hoary old traditional: Rogers wrote “Barrett’s Privateers” in 1976 because he wanted to sing lead in a sea shanty and there weren’t any in existence that had a baritone singing lead.

No, seriously. And now there are lots and lots of people, less than fifty years later, who think that Barrett’s Privateers is a couple hundred years old and has Always Been Here.

So I started thinking about dead genres, and it occurs to me to ask: why is the sea shanty largely dead? Or rather, actually, why is the work song, which is the larger category of music that sea shanties are a subset of, largely dead? Why don’t we sing work songs anymore when we’re working? Stan Rogers wrote the “White Collar Holler,” of course, and the premise of that song is indeed the notion of making a work song for office work, but I can’t imagine anyone actually signing it at the office as they go about their work. For one thing, I code quite a bit at my day job, and the speed at which I code doesn’t depend at all on what the people around me are doing; indeed, trying to match my speed to theirs would probably make us all less efficient.

Tay’s theory is that industrialization killed the work song in the West (they pointed out to me very explicitly that the idea isn’t actually dead world-wide), especially as work became more cognitive for many people and less reliant on keeping time with the people you’re working alongside. After all, work songs are most popular when the most efficient way to work is to keep pace with everyone at the same time, so you’re neither too fast nor too slow, and you’re all working at parts of the same tasks that rely on other people’s tasks to keep going without building up too much of a deadlock at any one part of the process. So much of work for so many people today is more like piecework than making things on an assembly line, and like piecework, it’s so much easier for our employers to encourage us to take the work home and keep making as many pieces as we can before we fall over and collapse… or else it’s service work, and you can’t be singing at service work, you won’t be free to quickly respond to clients and adjust your tasks to their needs.

I suspect that’s not entirely it, though, because assembly line manufacturing work isn’t actually dead in the West, not even close, and the work song is still gone from our halls. Tay pointed out that OSHA and hearing protection make it more difficult in many of those jobs to be connected to other workers and keep time on the song, and I think there’s definitely an element of truth to that, too.

But I think the death of the work songs go even deeper than that. See, work songs didn’t completely vanish as work became less dependent on keeping time together. They just turned into songs about the condition of working, and from there they turned into songs about unionization, workers’ rights songs, like the ones the Wobblies used to great effect in the 20s. And that happened in response to managers and bosses who see singing and talking and responded by trying to control workers and make that shit stop. Some of that is about controlling unionization but some of it is about control, full stop: pretending to oneself that workers only really exist while you pay them as cogs that produce labor, and anything else they do is a distraction from the labor you pay for.

Why is it that we don’t have modern work songs for Amazon workers? There are enough of them, after all, their very boring and physically demanding jobs depend on keeping time together, and everyone’s working together in a relatively quiet environment. I’ll tell you: it’s because Amazon views interactions among its workers as a threat and bans workers from talking to one another or listening to music while they execute their shifts.

We lost the work song, I think, because we gained bosses that see the work song as a threat instead of an intrinsic part of keeping the work force from getting bored and stale and tired and making mistakes. In a real way, killing the work song is a decision you make if you don’t understand the value of the work song to the workers themselves: it makes the work less boring, so you stall out less, and it reminds you you’re all doing this together, and it keeps you all in time. The action of singing is valuable. But if you’ve never sung while you worked collectively on a project, you might not know that, and if you think in terms of zero-sum losses, the song becomes a waste of good breath you’re paying for at best and a threat of insurrection at worst.

And it’s very interesting thinking about the labor conditions on a spaceship that might bring such songs back again as useful aids to coordinating the labor of monitoring and running the ship. Or even, for that matter, coordinating the labor of other tasks in a spacefaring economy. Warframe’s “We All Lift Together” is one of these, of course. Surely there have to be others?

Oh I love this grison

Okay but I would be remiss if I

a) didn’t reblog this for it’s own merits because music recs and very very good commentary

b) I definitely really wonder if the work song could be perceived as a threat also because they promote the sense of comraderie and closeness that union busting corps actively discourage (along with the genetics they share with working condition protest songs described above). (Though I also wonder if some of the die-out here is related to how comparatively devoid of public, casual singing/music north american culture is, outside of specific subcultures of course… like singing/music is treated a lot as something that professionals or studied amateurs do, and otherwise it’s relegated to the privacy of your own home or very specific venues such as karaoke)

and

b) also add the Longest John’s cover of We All Lift Together (thank you @dungeonmastersconsortium for introducing me to it) because it’s VERY VERY GOOD (and I may have listened to it on repeat more than a few times over the last while):

(via chalkrevelations)

silirial:

kedreeva:

dreorzen:

nudityandnerdery:

ub-sessed:

kedreeva:

cheesedemon:

digitaldiscipline:

spontaneousmusicalnumber:

hamvendor:

hamvendor:

How come semi trucks in Europe look like “toot toot :)” and in North America they look like “HONK HOOOOOOOONK >:|”

image

“Henlo I am big twuck pwease give me wots of woom tank u :)”

image

“I WILL FUCKING PANCAKE YOUR CUCK ASS”

image

@trainwreckgenerator why did you hide these in the tags

This suggests that Maximum Overdrive was Jurassic Park for motor vehicles.

I’m sorry, but that is misleading as hell. American and European trucks are bred for different purposes.

American trucks are bred for long hauls on largely straight roads. They can go for hours without a break. A European truck needs more breaks and a lighter load, and they would indeed take great internal damage if they tried to keep up with the Longsnout.

image

The European Shortsnout is not bred for looks, but for agility! They navigate the windy roads of Europe in a way that would be way too risky for the powerful, but more clumsy American truck. It is true that the European overheats faster at high speeds, that is the very reason that breaks every 4,5 hours are mandatory for both the truck and the handler and a day of driving can never be longer then 9 hours.

image

So, all in all, appreciate all of our trucks and our shared history, and be the responsible owner that gets the right breed for the right job.

To be fair, the US does have shortnose trucks as well, they’re just a breed kept mainly for very local work where, like the above says, they are working in places with lots of turns, shorter drives, and plenty of stops. I see them used for garbage pickup a lot, where a longnosed Mack wouldn’t be able to fit much less maneuver, and the short nose prevents them from getting rubs (raw skin or even open sores) on their snouts.

image

I would also like to point out that the tags have got it backwards. The wild trucks (which I’m pretty sure are extinct in the wild now) that all modern breeds stemmed from were shortnose trucks. We had known about automobiles and domesticated several species, but the truck species was not discovered until close to the start of the 1900’s, in Germany, which I BELIEVE was the first country to breed them in captivity, although England was the first country to really start using them for work. I managed to find a photo of taxidermied specimen

image

As you can see, it resembles both long and short nosed breeds, as well as the far more common house truck used by individuals instead of for commercial work.

As to the aggression, while the mack longnose LOOKS aggressive, they’re generally gentle giants (although please do give them space on the road! not seeing you in their blind spot is NOT the same as aggression!), it is actually the smaller house truck that is often trained by their handler to be aggressive: the keyword being TRAINED, they are also not naturally aggressive. The only time I have seen a mack be commonly aggressive is when they are pulling 2 gravel trailers, and I would be cranky if I was being overworked, too. If you see them hauling that kind of load, just give them space, and you’ll be fine.

I feel like somebody should add something about the Australian variants.

From my understanding of Australian wildlife:

image

Does anyone know if/how American School Busses are related to trucks? 

Pics for reference:

image

The classic long-nose schoolbus

image

But short-nose varieties exist, I remember when they first started appearing in my district!

@dreorzen While school buses ARE in the automobile order, they are actually part of the Van family, not the Truck family, due to their passenger capacity. As you can see in the photos, they have no cargo bed or hookup, and are not really built for object transport. But they DO excel at carrying passengers, particularly children (although certainly not limited to just children)

They’re known to be exceptionally protective of any passengers, and if you look closely on that second image you can actually see a specialized appendage that is (I think) unique to school buses- a small, red, octagonal fan, which they extend when there are small creatures around them that they are acquiring or releasing. Much like an angler fish’s bioluminescent bulb appendage, this fan (along with several bioluminescent patches on top of their faces and on their hindquarters) works to mesmerize any other vehicles in close proximity, to where those vehicles will cease movement until the bus lowers the fan. It’s super fascinating behavior, and little wonder why we trust our children to these gentle, protective giants.

@bunjywunjy this seems like a post you need to see

(via twistedingenue)

artist-assassin-deactivated2021:

yusaofthedawn:

tiktoksthataregood-ish:

Look at what you did, you gave a dog an existential crisis 

THE LONG, FORLORN STARE OUT OF THE WINDOW AT THE WATER IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWED BY THE “HELP” SENT ME

(via boazpriestly)

jaaneymann:

image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image

stockmarket tweet compilation pt. 2 because the hits keep coming

(via andrasticmeasures)

Tags: fave

fallnangelcreations:

hopesterling:

socialistexan:

awsomelink:

one-time-i-dreamt:

Read more here:

image
image
image

Friendly reminder that GIMP does pretty much everything Photoshop does, and it’s 100% free. Fuck DRM and the license culture, we have plenty of open source options available to us as a consumer.

  • Lightworks is a freeware video editor on par with Premiere
  • Blender is an excellent freeware 3D renderer,possibly better than After Effects
  • Lightzone to replace Lightroom
  • Inkscape to replace Illustratr
  • Audacity to replace Audition (I also received a free version of Pro Tools with my Scarlett Solo audio interface)

If Adobe is going to be greedy shitheads, then fuck ‘em. Don’t use their stuff. Freeware can be just as good, if not better, than Adobe CC.

reblog to save a digital arts major

Reblog to save an artist.

(via therealbrigeedarocks)

Tags: fave reference

Anonymous asked: Is Google Drive safe, privacy-wise? I only use it for schoolwork and some for-fun writing, but I don't know what information it gathers from its users

ms-demeanor:

ms-demeanor:

I don’t really consider any google services private, but I also don’t consider cloud backups or cloud programs of any kind private.

You’re probably cool on schoolwork and for-fun writing.

I don’t know, friend. I’m old-school paranoid. My parents raised me to never write anything down unless I’d be cool with it being on the front page of the newspaper so on the one hand I’m very open with a lot of stuff because, fuck it, if it’s touching the internet at all I may as well act like it’s public knowledge because at some point it will be. On the other hand I pretty much NEVER discuss some of the stuff that I’m doing unless it’s in person and away from electronics. Spending half my life hanging out with hackers has only reinforced this attitude.

It sort of depends on what level of privacy you’re looking for. Google is invasive and is going to track a lot about your online behavior (where you shop, who you talk to, how long you’re online, your physical location, what devices you use, what apps you use, your speech patterns) but it’s pretty unlikely to, I don’t know, publish the entire history of your sexual roleplaying or something like that.

But, like, tumblr would sell your soul to satan for one corn chip. Google is a bit more circumspect.

Most of the information we worry about putting up online has the potential to be personally embarrassing - weird fetishes, bad opinions, etc. Sometimes that’s got significant personal fallout - having your email breached is a big deal if it’s how you were communicating with the person you were cheating on your partner with and it leads to divorce or loss of custody.

Be careful about putting that kind of thing online, sure, but that’s not the kind of thing that’s generally a concern when dealing with data collection. Google will try to sell you an ovipositor dildo based on your search history but it isn’t going to email that information to your professor. For things like that you need to be careful about the people you know, the people who have grudges against you, etc. Google won’t kink shame you; your ex might try to do so if they think it’ll help them get custody of your kids.

Where you have to be EXCEPTIONALLY careful, to the point of not putting anything up online anywhere at all, is for things that can be considered criminal.

Which is kind of fucked up, considering the ongoing criminalization of society. Which has been happening for a while.

So, real anarchist talk, if everything is potentially a crime we’re forced to live in a society that is constantly fearful of the law. When privacy comes up people say “well I don’t have anything to hide, you must be doing something wrong” because they can’t conceive of things like “leaving water out for people in the desert” or “feeding the homeless” or “being gay” as prosecuteable offenses. But they are! (they shouldn’t be, but they are)

So in a world where planning to destroy hostile architecture is a potential felony, where you can be arrested as a journalist covering a protest, where people are executed for their sexualities - well, in that world you’ve gotta ask yourself exactly how much information you’re comfortable putting in the hands of an entity that will happily pass it off to law enforcement if asked.

(In case anyone is curious, I am well aware that I’m insufferable; this nice anon just wanted computer advice and, whoop, here I go talking about the fundamental flaws in the structure of our society - hey look, here’s a manual on combating the criminalization of homelessness in your community; please go fuck up your next city council meeting, I love you)

Anyway if you’re looking for something more secure than google drive but still relatively accessible and less likely to bend over backwards to comply with the FBI consider protonmail.

They’ve got a free plan with limited storage or low-cost paid plans with more storage AND they’ve got a really high bar to clear before they’ll disclose user information (which you can make doubly secure by encrypting anything you put on it before you put it up). Protonmail is pretty dang good overall.

Hey for anyone wondering what i mean when i say all Google products are bad, this is part of what I’m talking about.

royalturkeyz:
“ foreverfangirlalways:
“ ventela1:
“ onion-souls:
“ coolyo294:
“scientist voice: today i will be a dick to this cricket
”
The phrase “exposed to this spider torment” will haunt me
”
People in the notes have entirely misunderstood the...

royalturkeyz:

foreverfangirlalways:

ventela1:

onion-souls:

coolyo294:

scientist voice: today i will be a dick to this cricket 

The phrase “exposed to this spider torment” will haunt me

People in the notes have entirely misunderstood the point of this experiment and what it entails.

It’s not “proving that crickets can be traumatized”. It’s proving that *animals can genetically pass on the stress that a dangerous situation causes, and the offspring will instinctually respond to the same situation without ever having personally experienced it.*

And that’s a big deal for many things, including human psychology.

When Nazis invaded The Netherlands, local Dutch peoples were under extreme emotional and physical duress. The Nazi army took their food for the soldiers, starving the population. They patrolled the streets and harshly reinforced their new laws. Existence was horrible and some parents had to give their children away to wealthier families because they couldn’t feed them anymore. This event is known as the Hongerwinter, or Dutch Famine.

One generation later, the children of mothers who were pregnant at the time of the famine have been proven to exhibit intense reactions to stress, and heightened fight or flight responses. They also experience more obesity because their bodies are prepared for starvation.

Some of these children were never personally exposed to the famine. Their mothers gave birth after conditions had improved, or even after moving to another country. But the effects are there, and those people are now adults who can recognize this and attest that they didn’t experience something else traumatic during childhood. It was passed on in the womb.

You can read about it here: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2018/01/31/science/dutch-famine-genes.amp.html

This is called epigenetics. It’s essential to understanding how the human brain and body works. That our responses to stress can be passed on genetically. That it can show up in how we look physically, our physical health, our mental responses, our instinctual reactions. It’s especially important for people who are in therapy and need to understand *why* they act a certain way before they can actually work on it.

So no, this experiment wasn’t “haha let’s torment a cricket”. I’m not going to argue the potential cruelty of the experiment with people. I just want you to understand what it actually all MEANS.

Reblogging for that last comment!

This would be a great time to remember that epigenetics applies even where it isn’t studied. Black people were enslaved in horrible conditions for centuries then experienced Jim Crow, and continuing police brutality.

Black people are incredibly underrepresented in medical studies and epigenetics would be difficult to study in black people anyway because of the many racial stressors we face. But plenty of black doctors have suggested this would be an extremely important and eye opening place to look into but the funding and interest often not always there.

Think about the instances world wide of genocide, colonisation, war, ect and how this would effect the unborn people of that population even if those things weren’t currently going on.

Think about the stress of poverty on the bodies of the poor.

The far reaching effects of violence on othered bodies and our genes is something I think we’ll never have full access of information to.

(via pterawaters)

yennciri:

Even after everything we’ve been through…Would any of us go back to the world we’re used to? 

The series finale aired 2 years ago today [8th June 2018]

(via ink-splotch)

Tags: Sense8

blendinblandin:

connecting with a fictional character like

image

(via xeniawarriorprincesa)